安徽路人假 -
The network information technically flies to soon develop and extensively applied, also brought a new challenge for people"s protection of the right of privacy at the time of bringing people the convenient and fast life style and huge business benefits.Practice medium on-line infringement affairs, particularly the affairs multifarious occurrence which violates network right of privacy, make the lawmaking protection of network right of privacy become theories and practice a medium hot point problem.The international communities all are aware of urgency to carry on the law protection to network right of privacy nowadays, but the our country law definitely didn"t rule right of privacy currently.The provision just passed reputation power as to it"s carry on a protection, belong to lawmaking blank more to the protection of network right of privacy.Therefore should try to draw lessons from abroad of related protection mode, combine our country state of the nation, take lawmaking rules and regulations as predominance, assist it take charge of by profession self-discipline, technique protection and government, set up citizen to protect personal consciousness of privacy in the meantime, with realization to network right of privacy of valid protect.This text takes the United States and EU as the representative"s two greatest lawmakings mode through a research and currently our country"s lawmaking condition in network right of privacy, put forward some counterplans and suggestion towards set up our country network right of privacy lawmaking protect system.Promote thus our country to the mechanism that the law of network right of privacy protect of perfect, attain full protection network right of privacy of purpose.
基本上是对的，累死我了，我可没用机译哦，是我自己翻译的，要选我的哦
阿里阿涅德 -
Network of information technology, rapid development and wide application to bring people in a convenient, speedy way of life and enormous commercial interests, but also to protect the privacy of people have brought new challenges. Online practice violations, especially against the network of frequent incidents of privacy, the privacy legislation to protect network theory and practice to become a hot issue. Countries in the world today are aware of privacy on the network to carry out the urgency of the protection of the law, and at present no specific legal provisions of China"s right to privacy. Only through the provisions of reputation to protect, the protection of privacy on the network and it is the legislative gap. Therefore examination of the relevance of the protection of foreign models, combined with China"s national conditions, to introduce legislation to regulate the system-oriented, to be complemented by industry self-regulation, technology protection and government regulation, at the same time, foster civic awareness of the protection of personal privacy, privacy on the network in order to achieve effective protection. In this paper, by studying the United States and the European Union, represented by the two legislative models as well as China"s in the network status of privacy legislation on the construction of legislation to protect the privacy of our network system made a number of countermeasures and suggestions. Network so as to promote China"s legal protection of privacy mechanism, to fully protect the privacy of the purpose of the network.
芝华塔尼欧的少年
-
The rapid development of information technology network and application, bring in people convenient, quick way of life and the great commercial interests, but also give people the protection of privacy has brought new challenges. Online practice violations, particularly violations of the privacy of network frequent, privacy laws that protect a network theory and practice of a hot issue. Today"s world is aware of network privacy protection, and the urgency of China law stipulates privacy. Only through the reputation of the provisions on the protection of network privacy protection more of legislation. So should try to use for reference foreign related to protected mode, and combined with actual situation in China, to regulate, supplemented by the self-discipline, technical protection and government regulation, at the same time, establish the citizens to protect the privacy of personal consciousness, in order to realize the effective protection of network privacy. This paper, through studying in the United States and the European Union represented by the two legislative mode and current network privacy legislation in China, to construct network privacy legislation protect system, puts forward some countermeasures and Suggestions. In order to promote our network privacy of the legal protection mechanism consummation, achieve full of network privacy.
北营 -
Labor
dispute
is
to
show
unit
of
choose
and
employ
persons
and
laborer,
based
on
labor
contract
and
related
laws
and
regulations
or
unit
of
choose
and
employ
persons
labor
system
formed
labor
contract
relationship
or
factual
labor
to
concern
and
controversy
of
rights
and
obligations.Labor
disputes
in
the
dispute
settlement
mechanism,
inevitably
involve
the
burden
of
proof.
Current
laws
will
labor
dispute
into
the
civil
procedure
law,
the
scope
of
labor
relations
besides
general
civil
legal
relationship
of
equality,
also
has
its
unique
membership,
RenShenXing
etc.
In
labor
relations,
unit
of
choose
and
employ
persons,
laborer
is
one
side
were
managers,
between
the
managers
are
not
equal
status
in
the
burden
on
the
ability,
also
have
obvious
difference.
But
for
the
allocation
of
the
burden
of
labor
dispute
is
stipulated,
the
problem
of
the
concrete
practice
against.
In
the
labor
dispute
arbitration
or
litigation
of
burden
for
more
detailed
division,
with
scientific
proof
responsibility
theory
in
perfect,
better
fairness,
solving
labor
disputes.
This
paper
tries
to
discuss
the
labor
relations,
namely
the
adjustment
by
law
shall,
labor
relations,
is
a
kind
of
special
labor
relations.
Labor
relations
with
the
will
of
the
state
and
the
main
properties
and
will
concurrently,
equality
and
personal
relationship
and
property
relationship
with
nature.
According
to
different
classification
method,
the
labor
dispute
is
divided
into
the
individual
and
the
collective
controversy,
group
dispute;
Rights
and
interests
and
confirmation
of
disputes,
payment
of
controversy
and
alteration
of
controversy,
Confirmation
of
dispute,
payment
of
disputes,
the
change
of
dispute.
In
case
the
authorities
are
faced
with
the
burden
of
proof
allocation
problem.
The
problems
in
the
distribution
of
the
burden
of
proof,
different
theories.
There
is
a
legal
requirement
is
representative
of
the
classification,
probability,
the
danger
field.
In
civil
lawsuit
legal
requirement
basically
adopts
the
theory
of
distribution
classified
said
proof
responsibility.
And
according
to
the
provisions
of
labor
dispute
proof
responsibility,
referring
to
the
labor
dispute
mediation
and
arbitration
law,
regulations
and
judicial
interpretations
evidence
and
the
administrative
regulations,
the
provisions
of
the
way
is
clear
evidence
rules
and
regulations
of
the
article
6
of
the
labor
dispute,
but
the
burden
of
proof
is
too
general
and
narrow.
Overall,
about
labor
dispute,
below
the
proof
system：
（1）A
labor
dispute
case
of
lack
of
clear
proof
responsibility
theory
guidance
（2）The
judicial
interpretation
of
labor
dispute
lawsuit
which
determine
the
distribution
of
proof
responsibility
too
narrow
range
（3）The
judicial
interpretation
of
the
allocation
of
the
burden
that
does
not
conform
to
the
legal
requirements
classification
said
（4）Evidence
rules
of
labor
dispute
the
burden
distribution
does
not
conform
to
the
provisions
of
the
burden
On
the
distribution
of
labor
dispute,
the
burden
of
proof
for
different
scholars.
Some
scholars
think,
according
to
labor
dispute
7
disputes,
pay
disputes,
management
and
labor
contract
dispute
distribution
proof
responsibility,
Some
scholars
think
in
labor
law
relations
between
the
essence
of
unequal
status,
in
order
to
effectively
protect
worker,
should
execute
completely
burden.
The
author
argues
that
the
labor
dispute,
the
distribution
of
proof
of
labor
law,
according
to
labor
law
entity
proved
the
allocation
of
responsibility.
At
the
same
time,
the
burden
of
proof
for
the
distribution
of
labor
dispute,
must
consider
our
about
the
inherent
theoretical
proof
responsibility
allotment,
it
has
now
been
gradually
mature
proof
responsibility
distribution
theory
blind
pursue
path.
In
labor
disputes
in
the
allocation
of
the
burden
of
proof,
the
following
aspects
should
be
taken
into
consideration:
1.With
a
legal
requirement
for
the
classification
of
the
burden
of
proof
that
fundamental
principle
of
distribution
2.On
the
basis
of
equal
to
protect
the
lawful
rights
and
interests
of
the
parties
3.In
the
legislation
should
be
fully
clear
proof
of
labor
dispute
the
allocation
of
responsibility
principle
and
system
For
labor
dispute
the
burden
of
proof,
the
distribution
of
specific
rules
of
civil
procedure
to
borrow
in
lawsuit
classification
theories
of
labor
dispute,
the
types
and
the
civil
lawsuit
classification
theories
of
combination
of
labor
dispute
into
confirmation
(of),
to
FuXing
labor
dispute
(payment)
and
change
the
defense
of
the
labor
dispute
(the),
the
burden
of
proof.
On
the
burden
of
proof
for
distribution
of
labor
dispute,
laborer
still
exists
weak
evidence.
Unit
of
choose
and
employ
persons
in
the
arbitration
and
litigation
are
likely
to
mastering
the
evidence
material
intentionally
don"t
provide,
or
to
laborer
of
facts
says
"don"t
know,"
"don"t
remember,"
or
unit
of
choose
and
employ
persons
that
all
the
above
statements
do
disadvantage.
This
has
caused
the
evidence
difficult.
Workers
party
The
author
thinks
that
the
correct
application,
constructive
system
can
help
in
this
situation.
以上为
有道桌面词典
翻译结果，仅供参考。